Planck’s constant: does it matter for gravitational waves? - There is no experimental evidence that the Einstein -Planck energy - frequency relationship holds for gravity. This paper explores the consequences of the non existence of the graviton - that classical gravitational radiation is emitted by all objects in quadrupole motion. The effects of this on the measured properties of the hydrogen atom, along with possibilities to experimentally measure the effects of atomic or nuclear scale gravitational radiation is explored. Experiments similar to those that are measuring 'big G' should be able to detect the presence of such stochastic compton - like frequency background gravitational waves.
Solitions Emergent Physics – the proton - Abstract A proton model is presented where a mechanism for charge, electromagnetic and quantum effects are generated from pilot wave phenomena. The pilot waves are constructed from nothing more than gravitational effects. First a simple model of a proton is discussed. The physical consequences of such a model are explored, showing that this model can generate large […]
Farewell_1-364x549 Physics is broken. Worse than we think. - A couple of months ago I read Jim Baggot’s Farwell to Reality. I was very impressed. I won’t go into details, but the book takes the eminently reasonable suggestion that 11 dimensions, uncountable infinities of universes and other mainstream theoretical physics subjects are “fairy tale physics”.  Physics really needs people like Jim Baggot,  Peter Woit, and […]
ligo_background-large-white GW150914 – Enormous Gravitational Wave Energy - Eureka! The Ligo measurement is the greatest thing to happen in Physics and Astronomy for decades. Amazing work. It was about 50 years ago that the first gravitational wave detector was built by Weber. It took 50 years of refinement, many PhDs postdocs and full careers, but the LIGO team did. it. Observation of Gravitational Waves […]
Austrian Institute for Nonlinear Studies (AINS) Can a sub-quantum medium be provided by General Relativity? - Can a sub-quantum medium be provided by General Relativity? Thomas C Andersen, PhD As a personal note of celebration, Art McDonald, the director of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory has won the Nobel Prize in Physics. I worked on SNO for 8 years for my masters and PhD. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory also shared the Breakthrough […]
Screen Shot 2016-07-16 at 2.29.52 PM Published papers (pre 2010) - For my Masters and PhD I worked on the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, where I worked on the water purification team and also the computer simulation of the detector. It was a great time and I learned a lot from my Supervisor John Simpson at the University of Guelph in Canada. The papers below are SNO collaboration […]
st-eq2 Removing the Speed of Light as a postulate - The Speed of Light The speed of light limit is at this point a postulate of physics, which is necessary as: Electromagnetic Radiation travels at c. Maximum speed of particles is c. (Lorentz equation). Relativistic QM – depends on c as a postulate. Strong force. more… These are in the Standard Model disparate fields and laws. […]
alphadecay Couder’s memory effect – could it be real? - Yves Couder’s (and others) experiments with small (in the human sense) and absolutely huge (in the quantum sense)  silicon oil droplets and baths have proven to be a wonderful analog for quantum mechanics. There are many researchers who think that these experiments show something much more – they hint at what the microscopic quantum world […]
On_the_Relative_Motion_of_the_Earth_and_the_Luminiferous_Ether_-_Fig_3 Einsteins Aether as the Inviscid Fluid for Brady’s Sonons? - The Aether Einstein: We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also […]
Hawking and Ellis, in The LargeScale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge 1973) Cosmic serendipity – not censorship - Cosmic Censorship: Weak or strong, the cosmic censorship conjecture states that naked singularities can’t be seen, otherwise everything will break down, it would be really bad and worst of all theorists would be confused. But it turns out that singularities very likely don’t actually exist in a real universe governed by GR. Any lumpy, non symmetric […]
Screen Shot 2016-07-16 at 2.42.16 PM An Electron model from Gravitational Pilot Waves - Abstract An electron model is presented where charge, electromagnetic and quantum effects are generated from pilot wave phenomena. The pilot waves are constructed from nothing more than gravitational effects. First the general model of the electron is proposed. Then the physical consequences are laid out, showing that this model can generate large electron – electron […]
QM from waves – pilot waves. - I start with a screen grab from the video below. Yves Couder and friends are clearly looking at hidden variable theories: Here is a 3 minute movie with the above slide: The pilot-wave dynamics of walking droplets Here is a paper about eigenstates, etc… Self-organization into quantized eigenstates of a classical wave driven particle  (Stéphane Perrard1, Matthieu […]
Constructing a Geometrical Dipole - Can’t be done, it would seem, since gravity is spin 2. Well, electromagnetism is spin 1, but we have tech gadgets and a billion transistors on one chip. So can one construct a machine that behaves like a dipole? Take a canonical dipole. Two radio antennas, both vertical, one transmitting, the other receiving. The question […]
Is the strong force ‘just’ electrostatics? - I read this paper today like a breath of air. What if the electron is not a single negative charge, but rather an onion like arrangement of charge, with an excess of 1 unit negative? Same for the neutron and proton (instead of 1/3 charged quarks). Have a look at the image on the right. […]
What is Quantum Mechanics - How is that even a question? Previous posts have all not mentioned quantum effects at all. That’s the point – we are building physics from General Relativity, so QM must be a consequence of the theory, right? Here are some thoughts: QM seems to not like even special relativity much at all. It is a […]
Lessons from the Woodward effect - Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodward_effect Now I’m not sure that he is onto something real or not, although experiments are still being performed which detail positive results. He does have some pretty convincing arguments about what happens to an object with a varying mass: Let us suppose that, viewed in our inertial frame of reference moving with respect to […]
The gravitational electron - I will show with a few simple equations how it could be that electrons and electromagnetic theory can be constructed from GR alone. 1) The electron is some sort of GR knot, wormhole or other ‘thing’, which has one property – its mass is moving from 0 to 2*me in a wave pattern. Well actually, […]
All physical theories are wrong. Where will Quantum Mechanics fail? - History has showed us that all physical theories eventually fail. The failure is always a complete failure in terms of some abstract perfectionist viewpoint, but in reality, the failure only amounts to small corrections. Take for instance gravity. Newton’s theory is absurd – gravity travels instantly, etc. But it is also simple and powerful, it […]
So what are electrons, really? - According to the accepted theories of physics, this question is not in good taste. An electron is described by charge, mass, and a few other parameters. But there are no ‘whys’. Why do electrons have a charge of 1? or a mass of 0.511 MeV? No one knows. Most physicists will not think or worry […]